Talk:Constants - Revision history

Wormbo: ah yes, the UScript compiler...

2015-11-20T15:28:51Z

ah yes, the UScript compiler...

SeriousBarbie: /* Constants with same name in different functions (UE1) */

2015-11-19T05:29:17Z

‎Constants with same name in different functions (UE1)

Wormbo: consts are always global

2015-11-19T05:11:25Z

consts are always global

SeriousBarbie: Constants with same name in different functions (UE1)

2015-11-19T04:33:42Z

Constants with same name in different functions (UE1)

New page

== Constants with same name in different functions (UE1) ==

The UE1 compiler UCC.EXE does not support constants with the same name in different functions.

Example:
<pre>class test expands Object;

function Nothing1() {
const CDebug = true;
return;
}

function Nothing2() {
const CDebug = true;
return;
}</pre>
On compiling this, a GPF occurs:

----

Parsing Test
General protection fault!

History: FScriptCompiler::CompileConst <- Const <- FScriptCompiler::CompileDeclaration <- FScriptCompiler::CompileStatement <- FirstPass <- TryCompile <- FScriptCompiler::CompileScript <- (Class BarbiesWorld.Test, Pass 0, Line 9) <- MakeScript <- MakeScript <- DoScripts <- UEditorEngine::MakeScripts <- UMakeCommandlet::Main

Exiting due to error

----
--[[User:SeriousBarbie|SeriousBarbie]] ([[User talk:SeriousBarbie|talk]]) 23:33, 18 November 2015 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 20 November 2015
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:That's because it doesn't really apply the scpoing concept to constants. They are always global to the class. —[[User:Wormbo\|Wormbo]] 00:11, 19 November 2015 (EST)		:That's because it doesn't really apply the scpoing concept to constants. They are always global to the class. —[[User:Wormbo\|Wormbo]] 00:11, 19 November 2015 (EST)
	::I did not find any scope description in the article - therefore I found it worth to mention here. (BTW: UScript is the first language I saw where the scope of local definitions extends that area.) --[[User:SeriousBarbie\|SeriousBarbie]] ([[User talk:SeriousBarbie\|talk]]) 00:29, 19 November 2015 (EST)		::I did not find any scope description in the article - therefore I found it worth to mention here. (BTW: UScript is the first language I saw where the scope of local definitions extends that area.) --[[User:SeriousBarbie\|SeriousBarbie]] ([[User talk:SeriousBarbie\|talk]]) 00:29, 19 November 2015 (EST)
		+	:Well, the UnrealScript compiler is really basic compared to other languages - and it's written in really messy code. All these weird things are essentially compiler bugs. —[[User:Wormbo\|Wormbo]] 10:28, 20 November 2015 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 19 November 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:That's because it doesn't really apply the scpoing concept to constants. They are always global to the class. —[[User:Wormbo\|Wormbo]] 00:11, 19 November 2015 (EST)		:That's because it doesn't really apply the scpoing concept to constants. They are always global to the class. —[[User:Wormbo\|Wormbo]] 00:11, 19 November 2015 (EST)
		+	::I did not find any scope description in the article - therefore I found it worth to mention here. (BTW: UScript is the first language I saw where the scope of local definitions extends that area.) --[[User:SeriousBarbie\|SeriousBarbie]] ([[User talk:SeriousBarbie\|talk]]) 00:29, 19 November 2015 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 19 November 2015
Line 28:		Line 28:
	----		----
	--[[User:SeriousBarbie\|SeriousBarbie]] ([[User talk:SeriousBarbie\|talk]]) 23:33, 18 November 2015 (EST)		--[[User:SeriousBarbie\|SeriousBarbie]] ([[User talk:SeriousBarbie\|talk]]) 23:33, 18 November 2015 (EST)
		+
		+	:That's because it doesn't really apply the scpoing concept to constants. They are always global to the class. —[[User:Wormbo\|Wormbo]] 00:11, 19 November 2015 (EST)